Te Kete Ipurangi Navigation:

Te Kete Ipurangi
Communities
Schools

Te Kete Ipurangi user options:



English Online. Every child literate - a shared responsibility.
Ministry of Education.

Advanced search


Dr Livingstone, I presume?

Teacher Anne Girven

 

 YEAR

 LEVEL

 DURATION

7-8 4 6 weeks

 

Achievement Objective Being Assessed

Learning Outcomes

Transactional Writing  Write factual accounts, organising and linking ideas logically. Apply a range of skills to gather information, eg. skim rereading, note taking, summarising information.
Social Studies
Place and Environment 4.2
Why and how people find out about places and environments.
 Identify different reasons people have for finding out about places and environments.

Processes

 Processing Information  Gather, select and present coherent information from a variety of sources, using different technologies.
 Thinking Critically  Discuss and convey meanings in texts, exploring relevant experiences and other points of view.
Social Studies
 Inquiry Plan questions, collect, process and communicate information through the presentation of a brochure, a fact file or using PowerPoint.

Supporting Achievement Objective

Learning Outcomes

 Close Reading Discuss language, meanings, and ideas in a range of texts. Extract, compare and contrast relevant information from a variety of sources.
 Interpersonal Speaking  Report the results of research/inquiry to the class coherently, in small or large groups organising the information effectively.
 Poetic Writing Write a diary/log (Dr Livingstone) expressing ideas and experiences imaginatively, using appropriate vocabulary and conventions, shaping, editing and reworking text.

 

Introduction

 The aim of this unit is for the students to develop information research study skills through shared, guided and independent reading programmes - gathering and ordering information, question setting, resource selection, skim reading, note taking, summarising, and use of electronic resources, eg. CD ROM/Internet. See:

  • Gwen Gawith - Action Learning (Longman Paul 1988)

Teacher background reading

Teaching and learning activities

Select and adapt these learning activities to best meet the needs of your students, and to fit the time available:

Learning task 1

Learning task 2

Learning task 3

Links for students

Collaborative online projects:

Assessment

Assessment task

 Explain to the students the assessment indicators for this task. Groups then decide upon three or four key questions they want answered:

  • How and why people find out about places.
  • The reasons people have for these expeditions.
  • The challenges/problem faced.

The students will conference with the teacher to ensure that the questions are not so specific or closed that the research process is invalidated or so broad as to be unmanageable. Information is to be presented in small groups using, eg. PowerPoint, OHT, fact file or a brochure.

self_assessment (RTF 11KB)
assessment (RTF 9KB)

See also:

Clips to view or articles to read

Learning task 1

Learning intention(s) We are learning to frame the inquiry.
KCs/Principles/Values focus Relate to others – explore a range of different perspectives; work collaboratively
Participate and contribute – choose authentic and meaningful contexts
Think – make connections; use graphic organiser as a thinking tool

To develop their information literacy skills students will complete an authentic inquiry which has some link to their course work. A possible way of creating strong links with course work is to link their inquiry topic to their work around the "Explain significant connection(s) across texts, using supporting evidence" standard. For example, students could be reading a variety of texts which share a thematic connection of "control".

  1. Ask students to brainstorm words/ phrases which link to the concept of control. This could include words/phrases such as "power", "laws", "government", "rules and regulations", "self control", "boundaries", "discipline".
  2. Use these words and phrases to guide students to areas around which they could frame an inquiry. For example:
  • The legal drinking age in New Zealand
  • Drug laws
  • How aspects of technology such as computer games or social networking may control people
  • The legal driving age in New Zealand.

It is important to ensure that the area that is chosen as the basis for inquiry must give scope to be considered from at least two different viewpoints. This will give students the opportunity to draw conclusions and/or offer some informed advice on the issue.

Before requiring students to choose their own inquiry topic, you will need to model key parts of the inquiry process to the class, using material such as that below. The modelling process will provide the opportunity for you to teach students some important information literacy skills as well as demonstrate to students how they can plan, record, and present the results of their inquiry.

An important aspect of framing the inquiry involves building background knowledge. The modelled inquiry will be framed around the ideas concerning computer games.

  1. Ask students to do a PMI on computer games. What are the good points about them? What are the bad points about them? What are some other interesting ideas about them?
  2. Discuss the idea of stakeholders. Ask students to make some predictions about the possible groups/stakeholders who may have opinions on computer games. Make a list of these stakeholders.
  3. Choose three or four clips to view or articles to read. As students view or read, ask them to add to their list of stakeholders.

Some other activities to build background knowledge could be:

Hold an  Irish debate

A cline : Ask students to decide where they stand on the statement: “Computer games are harmless”. Strongly agree/ agree/ disagree/ strongly disagree. Class members stand in a line in the classroom according to where they rank themselves about this statement. Each person needs to come up with at least two reasons to justify where they stand. Each person needs to use their justifications to persuade the person next to them to move further up/down the cline.

Discussion cardsjigsaw activity
Students are given a discussion card. (for example, parent, gamer, doctor, researcher, teacher …) They form a group with others who have the same discussion card. The groups then discuss some arguments they could use to justify their case for or against the above statement. They then form themselves into groups where each member of the group has a different discussion card. Each group member now needs to argue their case within the group, using some of the ideas that were talked about with the previous group. This can then lead to full class discussion.

Learning task 5

Learning intention(s) We are learning to evaluate sources 
KCs/Principles/Values focus Relate to others – peer discussion
Think – make reasoned judgements about sources
Use language, symbols and texts – explore the language used to evaluate
  1. Investigate, with students, ideas about the reliability and trustworthiness
    of sources. (While the focus here is on websites, it should be remembered that there are other useful sources such as books and Information File material which are not electronic, and it may be useful to explore these sources with students.)
    Some particular areas to focus on are
    • Whose site is it?
    • Reliable domain names
    • Is the writer an expert?
  2. Discuss the idea of bias.
  3. Revisit the notion of stakeholders. Ask students to check out the websites in the stakeholder table to determine the kind of a stake each website writer /owner might have. (ie What might they be trying to achieve through their website? What might they be hoping to get out of it? What might their purpose be in writing/ constructing the website?)
  4. Ask students to complete the bias table by filling in examples of the different indicators of bias from the texts on the stakeholders table.
  5. In order to familiarise students with the language of evaluation, cut up the evaluation table and use it as a matching exercise. Have students compare answers with a peer, and to discuss differences. (Students will later use this language when they complete an evaluation exercise on their own chosen sources.)
  6. For an extension exercise students could evaluate the reliability and trustworthiness of some sites such as Tree Octopus, Google Technology.

Oral language

Classroom resources 

Learning Through Talk: Oral Language in Years 1–3: This resource is intended to help teachers of students in years 1 to 3 to understand the central role of oral language in supporting students’ learning. It suggests ways that teachers can help their students to become effective thinkers and communicators who use a range of strategies to make sense of the world, generate new ideas, and use language in increasingly sophisticated ways for specific purposes. It is available from Down the Back of the Chair.

Learning Through Talk: Oral Language in Years 4–8: This resource is intended to help teachers of students in years 4 to 8 to understand the central role of oral language in supporting students’ learning. It suggests ways that teachers can help their students to become effective thinkers and communicators who use a range of strategies to make sense of the world, generate new ideas, and use language in increasingly sophisticated ways for specific purposes. It is available from Down the Back of the Chair.

Oral language readings

Developing classroom speaking activities: From theory to practice (63 kB): Article by Jack Richards written for classroom teachers.

Oral Language: Discusses the literacy challenges for English language learners and identifies effective teaching strategies for scaffolding oral language (The Education Alliance, Brown University).

Expanding Oral Language in the Classroom van Hees, J. (2007): This book offers a wide range of teaching and learning strategies for expanding learners’ oral language in the classroom.

Weather

This topic is broken into 3 subtopics – click on a link to see the activities in each subtopic:

In each subtopic, students:

  • listen, look, read and talk to establish familiarity with the context
  • are introduced to 20 target words
  • practise recognising and producing the written and spoken forms of each word
  • relate form and meaning
  • practise recognising the environment in which the words usually occur
  • use the words in new contexts.

Topic objective

  • Recognise and use specialist and general vocabulary relevant to the science curriculum strand Making Sense of Planet Earth and Beyond.
  • Read and listen in order to understand and respond to simple information about weather.

What you need

  • Audio player
  • Scissors
  • Felt pens or coloured pencils
  • Glue
  • Poster paper
  • A quiet space where students feel comfortable listening and speaking
  • A range of easy factual readers
  • Bilingual dictionaries
  • Grammars and dictionaries for teacher reference

Monitoring and recording student progress

You can monitor and record student progress using the examples of good assessment practice in the English Language Learning Progressions or the English Language Learning Progressions Pathway record of progress.

Learners with special education needs

 The Ministry of Education's websites offer these links to specific areas to support learners with special education needs.

Bilingual Assessment Service Information

This service enables state and state-integrated schools to access a targeted group of trained Resource Teachers (Learning and Behaviour, RTLBs) to administer bilingual assessments of the learning needs of students from language backgrounds other than English. A bilingual assessment can distinguish between language learning needs, additional special learning needs, and social/emotional needs, through dual assessment in their first language and English.

Funded ESOL students and Special Education services

Migrant and refugee background students with special education needs, including those who receive ESOL funding, are entitled to special education services available in New Zealand schools. They would need to meet the eligibility criteria for that particular service (e.g. RTLB and RT Lit support, speech language therapy, ORS funding, Supplementary Learning Support). International fee-paying students are not eligible for these services.
The same applies for ESOL funding. A student who has any kind of special education funding is still eligible for ESOL funding as well, provided they meet the ESOL funding criteria.
The Migrant, Refugee and International teams ESOL Update newsletter provides full information on these criteria.

Gifted students with special learning needs (twice exceptional)

Twice exceptional (or 2E students) are sometimes also referred to as double labelled, or having dual exceptionality. These are gifted students whose performance is impaired, or high potential is masked, by a specific learning disability, physical impairment, disorder or condition. They may experience extreme difficulty in developing their giftedness into talent.

Gifted students with disabilities are at-risk as their educational and social/emotional needs often go undetected. Educators often incorrectly believe twice-exceptional students are not putting in adequate effort within the classroom. They are often described as ‘lazy’ and ‘unmotivated’. Hidden disabilities may prevent students with advanced cognitive abilities from achieving high academic results. 2E students perform inconsistently across the curriculum. The frustrations related to unidentified strengths and disabilities can result in behavioural and social/emotional issues.

Focusing Inquiry: Know your students

What literacy knowledge and skills do my students have in Health and Physical Education?

Use multiple sources of information to determine the focus of your inquiry – student voice, assessment information, diagnostic tasks.

  • Assessment Tools for Teaching and Learning e-asTTle This is a norm-referenced online tool for assessing reading achievement relevant to levels 2–6 of the curriculum. It provides national norms of performance for students in years 4–12.You may wish to discuss the implications of asTTle results for your learning area with the Literacy Leader in your school.
  • Subject resources related to NCEA assessments are available - select the relevant subject page.

What literacy knowledge and skills need to be developed?

  • The Literacy Learning Progressions describe the specific literacy knowledge, skills, and attitudes that students draw on to meet the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Teachers need to ensure that their students develop the literacy expertise that will enable them to engage with the Health and Physical Education curriculum at increasing levels of complexity.



Footer: