Te Kete Ipurangi Navigation:

Te Kete Ipurangi
Communities
Schools

Te Kete Ipurangi user options:



English Online. Every child literate - a shared responsibility.
Ministry of Education.

Advanced search


Feedback

Transcript

Gerard:
When we have a lesson like today, we're actually teaching them a skill. We can use the students' own work, which is far more relevant. And you're actually using their words and their things, so they can relate to it. And also you're more likely to hit on the exact issue or area for improvement that they need to improve on.

Today for your 'do now', what we're working on is we're looking at your biographical reports that you wrote last week, your four paragraphs. Netbook users, you can go to the page that is 'biological writing feedback' page, and you can find the 'do now' information there. The rest of you, the information is there for you to do it on the board.

The sentences that are up there are your own work, but some of the information has been changed so you can't identify the person who wrote it. Your job is to look at those sentences and figure out how each one can be improved.

Student 1:
We are on Google Sites, and we type in English 9TBo. Then we click on the link. Then you click on biographical writing feedback. Then we click on the link. Then we make a new copy.

Gerard:
Last thing I want you to do for today is I want you to open your doc of your biographical writing, and I want you to take two things you learnt from today and change it. Whether it's style you go through, and you look at and make sure, that with Adolf Hitler, you've spelt it with a capital 'A' and capital 'H' all the way through. Whether it is that you check all your sentences and make sure that you don't repeat the same phrase, or that you punctuate the speech in it correctly.

Student 2:
I'm writing a paragraph about Jesus Christ. And I wrote, Jesus Christ was born on December the 25th in Bethlehem. And if you can see there, our teacher highlighted it and he commented, what year?

Back to Gerard's class - teaching inquiry

Tamaki College's approach to differentiation

Tamaki College is a decile 1, state, co-educational school. The majority of the students are from Māori or Pasifika backgrounds. The introduction of netbooks for all students, and the move to a Google Docs environment, raised a need to individualise the learning programmes planned for each student. This meant knowing where each student was in terms of the curriculum levels and where they needed help to progress.

Technology allows the flexibilty to provide differentiated programmes - this is exemplified in these ways:

  • Students’ ability to access their work in their own time and work at their own pace. Learning is more readily accessible for students and is not contained to the resources selected by the teacher. The global choice of texts and genre writing is limitless so students are able to choose a wide variety of texts.
  • Publishing students’ work online has meant there is an authentic audience for their writing. This acts as a bigger motivator than just the teacher and the class. There is a global audience which means students develop more pride in their work and enthusiasm to produce excellent work. There is also easier access to personalisation of their work, allowing them to bring their own interests and strengths to their writing.
  • Feedback and questioning is immediate and equally available to all students - not just students who are confident to ask questions. An online environment eliminates the embarrassment of asking questions. This allows the teacher to respond to the learning need of every student and help all students progress upwards on the curriculum progressions.

Video clip: Head of English department (HoD) overview

Video clip: Head of English Department (HoD) choices

English HoD reflection - overview

 

Transcript

This year is the first year that our whole school has moved towards an approach where every student has their own Netbook. And our school and our community have wireless internet available at all times. It means that there's a change in the way that the students are learning and that they are finding more time to be responsible for their learning.

And their learning, for example, of English just doesn't happen in one 50 minute period a day. It can happen at home. It can happen at lunchtimes. It can happen before school, after school. It can happen during maths. It can happen at any time, when they feel the need to have to do some work.

It's also challenged our teachers in that we now no longer plan in a planning book. We... all our classes have a website that is made by the teacher and all resources are available.

So when a student comes into my class, they no longer look to the whiteboard. They open up their Netbooks, go to our class site, the day's lessons and resources are there, and they're able to access that not only in class but at any time as well.

So there's been a huge change in the way that we have to think about planning and learning. It's no longer just one event during a day. It can be anytime, any place.

Ours is kind of a backwards story. It wasn't a conscious decision that now we're going to teach in a differentiated way. What has happened with the technology is that it means that we have greater access to our students' work. We no longer teach as a class or mark as a class.

We have the same expectations of all our students, and the same endpoint. But what happens is that with the technology we can access our students' work at any time and individually. And so therefore, if I set a task, then the students can be working through on their own or as a group and what I can do is then access that work and give them individual feedback.

So the technology, allowing us to know our kids work a lot better and a lot more frequently, means that we're answering individual needs and we're talking individually with students about what their particular needs are and what they need to do to progress to improve their work.

The benefits are that I suppose if we think of differentiation in the past, it's been that we would separate the class into three groups and we'd produce three writing frames, for example. But because the resources are available to our students at any time, then they can use the 50 minutes in a class for their work, but they can also think about that later. And they can continue to work on that.

There's also a huge amount of communication that goes on between the students and the teacher via email and via messaging on their work. And it means that, for example, we're no longer teaching the whole class about apostrophes and assuming that everyone learns it, or everyone needs it. It means that when we look at an individual student's work, if they have a problem with apostrophes, then we can have that intense discussion just with them, whether it be online or whether it be a verbal discussion about the use of apostrophes.

back to Tamaki College's approach to differentiation

English HoD reflection - choices

 

Transcript

The internet has allowed the students to find exemplars of different types of work, and not only writing but visual texts and all sorts of things. In the past, I suppose that we felt we could manage with the time, it would be the teacher who selected either the type of writing or the resources that the students saw. So for example, if we were doing autobiographical writing, we would go into class with, you know, three or four or five different examples and that would be the only snapshot that our students would have of autobiographical writing. Now with the internet, we can discuss with kids what is the genre of autobiographical writing, and then they do the investigation themselves.

The students can look at, well, what are we being asked to do here and what are the possibilities. And so this year, we're seeing kids who are putting together kids picture books, we're seeing them doing websites, we're seeing them do presentations with... visual presentations behind them. It's challenging the students but also it's allowing us to teach more genre rather than just teaching pieces of writing. The students' production of their work also has changed a lot in two ways. I can see the first is that because of using the technology, and using the internet, it increases the importance for the students of their writing. It's no longer being published in an exercise book or on a piece of refill, it's online and can be accessed by them and by their families at any time. So that's kind of exciting. But the other thing is also because of the use of the internet and because of the use of the technology, they're spending a lot more time in the care in their presentation of the work because they realise that every piece of work is a presentation. So therefore they can personalise anything they do. Now of course the presentation is important and it's exciting and it's fun, but as English teachers what we're looking at is, if they're using visual texts, does that work? But also with their written text, especially we're looking... we're still teaching the same old things, we're teaching paragraph structure, sentence structure, and grammar. And making sure that that component is still as important as the visual text as well. I think our students are fairly visually literate anyway, meaning they can interpret images quite well, but then taking those rules and being able to reproduce them deliberately themselves I think is our next challenge, which is quite exciting too.

For example, with their writing, a student would spend a lot of time drafting and following our instructions, filling out grids and then producing a final piece of work. And to physically work on that and to write it with a pen in a workbook or on a piece of refill was an event. And then they would do their best to give it to us and we as teachers came at the end of the process. And then of course our job was we knew that it was a draft, where they thought it was a final copy. And so at the end of that process, we would then give it back to them with lots of comments and lots of highlights on it. And that was really demotivating for our students. They saw the teachers at the end of the chain like a rugby referee telling them when they were offside. But now because it's online and because we can access them as they're writing and work with them, the students and the teachers are seeing that together we're working and the students are seeing that their writing, especially, is not an event, it's a process. And so we can work alongside them. And the students are really responsive to that, they're excited to have their teacher working with them before they produce something. I suppose also physically, if they did something in a workbook and we highlighted it and gave it back to them, well then they had to start from scratch again. Where with the technology, they don't have to. They edit, they move on, and then they keep going.

We're seeing the achievement going up. We're also seeing that we're getting more merits and excellences because of the process and because of the kids' enthusiasm. We've always known as teachers at our school, we've always known our kids socially really well. They're always really happy to share about their family and what they do out of school, and what's going on, and what's going well and what's going poorly within their lives. But I think because of our access to their work, we haven't known their learning needs as well as we should have. Because we are daily seeing our students' work, we're getting to know their strengths and their weaknesses in terms of their needs in their language and their writing. So therefore we can confidently, or more confidently now I think, be able to say, well yes I know the learner's background and their social side, but I can now be able to say, well you know, this kid has these specific learning needs to be able to move them up the curriculum progressions.




Footer: